...UNTILL JUSTICE ROLLS DOWN LIKE WATERS AND RIGHTEOUSNESS LIKE A MIGHTY STREAM.
Dr. Martin Luther King. jr
qui tacet consentire ... He who is silent gives consent.
...UNTILL JUSTICE ROLLS DOWN LIKE WATERS AND RIGHTEOUSNESS LIKE A MIGHTY STREAM.
Dr. Martin Luther King. jr
Welcome to my homepage
My name is Abdulkadir
I am a juris, business and legal counsellor.
My areas of interest are:
Civil law, social law ,business law , personal statement ,judicature, consumerprotection, insurance, private international law and delegate management.
00 46 (0) 155 123538
Mobil: 0046 (0)70 888 00 71
0046 (0) 76 9550406
Mariebergsvägen 47/ 1 tr
611 66 Nyköping
00 46 (0)155 12 32 99
Doing Business In Dubai- UAE
STRUCTURING AND LICENSING FOR
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS WISHING
TO DO BUSINESS IN DUBAI-UEA
In addition to the possibility of setting up in one of Dubai’s
numerous free zones, international businesses wishing to do
business in Dubai may incorporate or register a local entity
under the Companies Law or the Civil Code, register a branch
or representative ofﬁce of a foreign company or enter into a
commercial agency relationship with a UAE national. Each of
these business structures (other than setting up in a
free zone) requires varying degrees of participation from UAE
nationals – for example, 51 per cent of the share capital of a
company incorporated under the Companies Law must be held
by UAE nationals, and branch and representative ofﬁces must
appoint a UAE national to sponsor the ofﬁce for its licence
application and for various other matters. Further, each of
these structures has limitations on the scope of permitted
activities. Most notably, a representative ofﬁce may generally
only perform marketing and administrative functions on behalf
of a foreign parent, and a branch ofﬁce may generally only
engage in activities which involve the promotion of the skills
and expertise of the person conducting the business.
How a company is measured
A company is not only measured by the returns it gives to its shareholders, but also by the returns it provides to the society, that is surely the true measure of any corporation.
A monday morning !!
How to invest for the best?
Europe got a head start on investment funds when Switzerland and Britain set up the first two, in 1849 and 1868 respectively. But a great innovation was made in the US (Boston, 1924) when the first “open-ended” fund was set up. Open funds – still the most popular type today – are more flexible than “closed” funds and, in practice, are easier to buy and sell, and prices are a more accurate reflection of the underlying assets than closed funds. The US is now the biggest investment fund market in the world, accounting for about €8000 billion, which is half of global investment (according to 2006 figures).
Businesses commonly invest in the same kind of funds as individuals – equities, fixed interest, government stock and cash, primarily – although the corporate sector will be more likely to invest in riskier and more sophisticated funds (such as currency and hedge funds). In theory, businesses should be hoping to get better returns from carrying out their own trade rather than investing in the markets, but the reality is very different. As well as wanting a cash buffer zone in economic conditions, which are increasingly difficult to predict due to globalisation, the internet, growing consumer power, energy shortages, and price rises mean that businesses increasingly need to hedge against currency fluctuations. Many simply want to take their time deciding how to invest in their own operating sector.
In 2006, only 47 per cent of the world’s investment fund money was in equities, with 18 per cent each in bonds (fixed interest) and money markets (cash), with the remainder in a mixture of these or in more specialist funds. When money goes out of equity and into cash, it is a clear sign that investors are nervous about the prospects for shares.
Historically, equity investment has outperformed fixed interest bonds by a significant margin since records began. In the US real (post-inflation) equity returns have averaged 7.1 per cent a year since 1925 while bonds have averaged just 2.3 per cent, and cash just 0.7 per cent, according to the Barclays Equity Gilt Study 2007. To put it another way, US$100 invested in 1925, with all income reinvested, would now be worth US$25,918 if the money had gone into equities, but just $635 if the investment had been in Treasury bonds.
HI AND WELCOME TO TESTO IURIS CONSULTUS
Testo Iuris Consultus is a domestic and international general legal counselling chamber. I advise and represent clients on a broadly diversified range of commercial transactions and offer a full range of legal services in private and business law.
I provide legal advice in Swedish and English , commercial and private international law. I am familiar with matters involving international commercial business contracts; product liability; intellectual property; personal injury; professional negligence.
My office handles both domestic and international business: in order to assist clients with their cross-border transactions we maintain close relationship with numerous correspondent law firms in other jurisdictions throughout the world.
International Law Association, Swedish chapter
Avocats Sans Frontiers
Your right as a customer
Now a days, almost anything we buy from a shop, catalogue or even Internet, there is some thing wrong with it. In this case what does law say as it stands in a situation like this. To start with, traders have a duty to supply products that are safe, in this case the dress in question. If the trader knowingly supplied unsafe goods, then they committed an offence. However if you buy an unsafe product, contact without delay your local Trading Standards Offence who will investigate the matter and prosecute the trader if necessary.
What does the law say?
One of most important laws governing your rights as a consumer is the Sale of Goods Act 1979. Like many laws it has evolved to keep up with changes in society so that the Act now includes the ‘amendments’ the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 and the Sale of Goods (amendment) Act 1995. This a wide-ranging legislation that applies to both new and second hand goods. It protects consumers by ensuring that:
1. Goods are of ‘satisfactory quality’.
2. The product must last a reasonable time and be free from defects.
3. Goods as ‘described’-a trader or advertisement must honestly descried the product. For example you buy a CD that turns to be a counterfeit.
4. Fit for purpose-products must do what the supplier says to do.
Customers benefit from various protection under the Sale of Goods Act 1979. This Act was updated and amended by the Sale and the Supply of Goods Act 1994. To benefit from it, I would advice my client must have entered into ‘contract of sale’. Section 2(1) of the 1979 Act defines this as: a contract by which the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods (the dress) to the buyer for money consideration, called the price. Section 14 of the 1979 Act may impose various ‘implied’ terms into your contract such as ‘satisfactory quality’ and goods being ‘reasonably fit’ for what they were bought for. Section 1 of the Sale and Supply of Goods Act of 1994, substantially updated section 14 of the 1979 Act, ‘satisfactory quality’ is now defined by section 14(2A), goods must be of satisfactory quality.
Satisfactory quality is further defined by section 14(2b) of the 1979 Act, so the quality of goods includes their state and condition and the following among others are in appropriate cases aspects of quality of goods.
(a) fitness for all purposes for which the goods in question are commonly supplied.
(b) freedom from minor defects.
(c) safety, and
If my client buys something that does not meet any of the conditions stated above, then I would advice him/her to demand many back from the trader (the shop) not the manufacturer, wholesaler or importer. If goods are not of satisfactory or reasonably fit for their purpose, the law provides my client with remedies. Legal remedies or options include-the right to reject goods (ask for refund) section 15B, 1979 Act and seek damages and treat the contract as repudiated (ended). If the purpose is not the what the goods are not commonly supplied for-see section 14(3) of the 1979 Act.
International Trade Contracts
Aspects of international trade contracts
contracts and the implications of it, by taking into account in their business transactions and financial.
The study included three sections ..
The researcher to view all the ideas on the subject of the thesis dealt with in accordance with the
First: the preliminary title: allotted by the researcher to study the legal concept of international trade rules and international commercial contracts has divided this section into two chapters, the first chapter of the concept of the legal system of international trade, and the second chapter allotted to study the legal concept of the holding of international trade and nature.
II: Part I: allotted for negotiations in international trade contracts and includes the section two, the first chapter allotted to study the legal concept of negotiations and agreements leading up to contract in international trade contracts, and the second chapter allotted to study the obligations of the parties and liability for the breach thereof at the stage of the negotiations.
III: Part II: allotted for the establishment and execution of the contract of international trade, has divided this section into three sections, the first between the provisions of the compromise in international trade contracts, and the second chapter allotted to study the content of international trade contracts and interpretation, and the third chapter dealt with the implementation of international trade contracts
Conclusion: where are the most important results revealed by the study with reference to some of the recommendations and proposals based on those results
The Islamic system of law
In general, Gulf states operate as largely patriarchal societies, headed and administered by ruling families, whose aim is to maintain the status quo while moving towards increased democracy (although in many cases the authorities seem to follow the old adage: ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’).
The Islamic system of law, known as Sharia (or Shari’a or Shariah), derives from four sources: the Holy Koran ( Qu’ran), Sunnah, Ijma and Qiyas. The Holy Koran, being the word of God ( Allah), is the principal source. The Sunnah comprises the accepted deeds and statements of the Prophet Mohammed, accepted by the whole Islamic world (the Ummah). Ijma is a consensus among religious scholars (the Ulema) regarding solutions to matters not specifically covered in either the Koran or the Sunnah. In difficult cases, where there’s no information to provide the basis for a clear decision, ‘analogous consideration’ ( Qiyas) is applied in conjunction with the three other sources of the law.
In Sharia law, as in other legal systems, a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The plaintiff and defendant are equal before the law – i.e. in a court of law – and it’s incumbent upon the former to provide proof of guilt. This involves producing two or four eyewitnesses, depending on the seriousness of the crime. If a plaintiff isn’t able to produce eyewitnesses, he can insist on the defendant swearing an oath as to his innocence. If the defendant refuses to take this oath, he’s judged to be guilty, as perjurers suffer hellfire and eternal damnation according to Muslim belief. Jews and Christians swear a different oath, but it has equal validity. A judge ( qadi) presides over the court and can put questions to all parties at will. There are no juries and often no lawyers to present the case for their clients. There are systems of appeal, which can be used in cases of serious crime and punishment.
According to ancient law, the payment of ‘blood money’ ( diya) for injury or death can be requested by the victim’s family as compensation. The amount of blood money required varies between the states (it’s most likely to be exacted in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE) and according to the circumstances of the death and to the extent of the hardship that the death will cause. For example, the death of a father of 12 would attract a larger payment than that of a child. A local Muslim’s life will be assessed for a larger financial benefit than people of other religions, faiths or nationalities. For example, in Saudi Arabia, a male Muslim’s life is worth SR100,000 (around $24,000), but Christians are worth only around half as much. And if the incident occurs in the Holy month of Ramadan, the penalty is usually doubled.
Under Islamic law, the crimes that carry defined penalties are murder, apostasy (rejection or desertion of Islam), adultery, fornication, homosexuality and theft. Interpretations of the law and punishments vary from state to state. Lesser offences might include debt, usury, alcohol and drug abuse, and use of pornography.
As an expatriate, you’re subject, of course, to the laws of the country you’re in. If you’re thought to have broken a law, you’re taken under arrest to a police station, questioned and instructed to make a statement. Up to this point, it’s highly unlikely that you will be allowed access to outside help, either legal or consular. If the offence is deemed serious enough to warrant your detention, you might have to wait some time before your case comes up. You will be allowed legal representation, but everything will be conducted in Arabic. Your statement will be translated into Arabic, and it’s important to insist that an appropriate official, e.g. a member of staff from your consulate, checks the accuracy of the translation and the content of anything you’re required to sign. If no one is available to do this, you should refuse to sign, or sign with an endorsement to the effect that you don’t have a clear understanding of the document.
In court, an interpreter will be present to assist you and an official from your embassy or consulate is likely to be present, although only as an observer. If you’re found guilty, the judge will sentence you and ask for your written acceptance of the sentence, unless you want to appeal. Appeals obviously go to higher courts, depend a great deal on the severity of the accusation and sentencing, and can take time. In very serious cases, political influence might be brought to bear on your behalf, provided that your country has sufficient influence, but this is rare. Having influence with a person in authority can be of help to you, although expatriates rarely have such influence. Locals, on the other hand, may be able to petition their ruler to seek his guidance and help. In minor cases, your employer might intervene to help, particularly if you’re valuable to him, as long as he won’t lose face.
If you’re unfortunate enough to be given a custodial sentence, this is intended as a punishment rather than rehabilitation. If you’re found guilty of a serious crime, you may find yourself in a hot, overcrowded prison, where treatment is often harsh and you might have to witness the punishment of others, including their flogging.
Ignorance of the law isn’t accepted as anexcuse before the law, so it’s as well to acquaint yourself with the laws of the country that you choose to live in.
Non-Muslim expatriates sometimes regard Sharia law as unbending and overly punitive, which it often is by western standards – and for good reason. Expatriates are largely expendable commodities and, if you’ve engaged in criminal activity, you’re sent home after punishment.
law is the predominant feature of many countries legal system, although there are also civil courts. Sharia law is applied to criminal matters and, although no executions or amputations have been carried out for some years.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW
International BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC LAW
General Incorporation law
A general incorporation law allows corporations to be formed without a charter from the legislature. It also refers to a law enabling a certain type of corporation, such as a railroad, to exercise eminent domain and other special rights without a charter from the legislature
Steps for incorporation
The filing of the
Articles of Incorporation
(also called a
Certificate of Incorporation
). The first step is to check with your state's
corporate filing office
(usually either the
Secretary of State
federal and state trademark registers
to be sure the name you want to use is available. You then fill in blanks in a preprinted form (available from
or your state's
corporate filing office
) listing the purpose of your corporation, its principal place of business and the number and type of shares of stock. You'll file these documents with the appropriate office, along with a registration fee which will usually be between $200 and $1,000, depending on the state.
How to Select a Corporation's Name. A corporate name is generally made up of 3 parts: "Distinctive element", "Descriptive element", and a legal ending. All corporations MUST have a distinctive element and a legal ending to their names. Some corporations choose not to have a descriptive element. In the name "Tiger Computers Inc." the word "Tiger" is the distinctive element; the word "Computers" is the descriptive element; and the "Inc." is the legal ending. The legal ending indicates that it is in fact a
and not just a
. You can choose from the following words: Incorporated, Limited and Corporation, or their respective abbreviations: Inc., Ltd. and Corp.
You'll also need to complete (but not file)
. These will outline a number of important corporate housekeeping details such as when annual shareholder meetings will be held, who can vote and the manner in which shareholders will be notified if there is need for an additional "special" meeting.
Reporting after incorporation
Assuming your corporation has not sold stock to the public, conducting corporate business is remarkably straightforward and uncomplicated. Often it amounts to little more than recording key corporate decisions (for example, borrowing money or buying real estate) and holding an annual meeting. Even these formalities can often be done by write
agreement and don't usually necessitate a face-to-face meeting.
International perspective on incorporation
The legal concept of incorporation is recognized all over the world. In the United States, corporations are identified by the term "incorporated" added after the business name, such as "Texas Instruments, Incorporated", or by putting the word corporation in the name of the company, as in "Netscape Communications Corporation". In
, the phrase Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (German: limited liability company; business entity, abbreviated
) as in "L'Orange GmbH", or Aktiengesellschaft (German: stock corporation, abbreviated as
) as in Deutsche Bank AG are used. In the
(abbreviation for limited company) or
(abbreviation for public limited company) are used for corporations. In
is used for corporations.
Small business ownership
As small business owners are well aware, we live in a time where anyone who feels that they have been wronged files a lawsuit. Now, more than ever, it is important that small businesses examine their options to determine the correct type of business entity in which to operate. Choosing the right type of business type can save your home and other personal assets being at risk if you are named in a business-related lawsuit.
Most individual owners of small businesses operate what is called a sole proprietorship. For example: George, a printer, opens George’s Print Shop. This is the cheapest way to operate with no special state filing requirements to start the business. The major problem with operating as a sole proprietorship is, of course, the personal vulnerability of the owner’s assets.
Running as a sole proprietorship means that George, the owner, is personally liable for any and all debts and claims made against George’s Print Shop. Personal liability is something to be steadfastly avoided if possible. It is better to do avoid the potential for personal liability before any lawsuits have been filed against a business.
A partnership is where two or more people operate a business in concert with a common goal, e.g. George and Fred, open George and Fred’s Print Shop. The partnership differs from the sole proprietorship in that there is more than one person that owns and is responsible for the business.
There are tax advantages to using a partnership in that income and losses of the partnership are generally passed through to the partners’ tax returns directly. However, a partnership carries the same potential for personal liability of each partner as a sole proprietorship, i.e., personal assets are at risk.
An additional potential problem is that each partner can bind the partnership and other partner(s) to contracts. Thus, a partnership carries the risk that your partner can put your personal assets at risk. If the print shop fails, both George and Fred’s personal assets are at risk for creditors to use to satisfy debts owed by George and Fred’s Print Shop. It is very important before entering into a partnership that you know AND trust your partner(s).
Another type of partnership is called a “limited partnership”. A limited partnership has at least one “general partner” with full personal liability for all partnership debts. However, the limited partnership also has “limited partners” who have liability and participation in the business limited to their investment in the partnership.
A Corporation is a separate entity such as George and Fred’s Print Shop, Inc. Use of a corporation limits the liability of all of the owners (stockholders) of the corporation. Provided the corporation is set up correctly and initially has adequate capitalization and maintains the separateness of the corporate entity there is no personal liability for the stockholders.
Formation of a corporation is not nearly as simple as with a partnership. There are specific filings that must be made with the State and certain corporate formalities that must be maintained in order to preserve the corporate status and limited liability. Additionally, a corporation is more expensive since yearly fees and taxes must be paid.
The major advantage to the corporate entity is, of course, its limited liability. With a limited partnership, only the general partner would still be liable for the damages to the injured party. In a corporation, generally only the corporation is liable, not the officers, directors or shareholders.
Branches of International Law
, is the body of law that "regulates the activities of entities possessing international personality". Traditionally, that meant the conduct and relationships of states. However, it is now well established that International Law also concerns the structure and conduct of international organizations, and, to a degree, that of multinational corporations and individuals.
The term "Public International Law" is occasionally used as a synonym to distinguish International Law from
"Private International Law"
. The latter regulates the relations between persons or entities in different states and is in fact not international law at all (a better term which has been suggested for
private international law
conflict of laws
The scope of international law
The value and authority of international law is entirely dependent upon the voluntary participation of states in its formulation, observance, and enforcement. Although there may be exceptions, most states enter into legal commitments to other states out of enlightened self-interest rather than adherence to a body of law that is higher than their own. The formation of the
created a means for the world community to enforce international law upon members that violate its charter. Traditionally,
were the sole
of international law. With the proliferation of
over the last century, they have in some cases been recognized as relevant parties as well. Recent interpretations of
international human rights law
international humanitarian law
international trade law
Chapter 11 actions) have been inclusive of corporations, and even individuals.
Fundamental conflicts over international law
The 17th, 18th and 19th centuries saw the growth of the concept of a "nation-state", which comprised nations controlled by a centralized system of government. The concept of nationalism became increasingly important as people began to see themselves as citizens of a particular nation with a distinct national identity. Until the beginning of the 20th century, relations between nation-states were dictated by Treaty, unenforceable agreements to behave in a certain way towards another state. Many people now view the nation-state as the primary unit of international affairs. States may choose to voluntarily enter into commitments under international law, but they will often follow their own counsel when it comes to interpretation of their commitments. As the 20th century progressed, a number of violent armed conflicts, including WWI and WWII, exposed the weaknesses of a voluntary system of international treaties. In an attempt to create a stronger system of laws to prevent future conflicts, international law was strengthened through the creation of the United Nations, an international law making body, and new international criminal laws used at the Nuremberg trials. Over the past fifty years, more and more international laws and law making bodies have been created.
Many people feel that these modern developments endanger nation states by taking power away from state governments and ceeding it to international bodies such as the U.N. and the World Bank. Some scholars and political leaders have recently argued that international law has evolved to a point where it exists separately from the mere consent of states. There is a growing trend toward judging a state's domestic actions in light of international law and standards (see
for trends and movements leading in this direction). A number of states, notably including the
vehemently oppose this interpretation, maintaining that sovereignty is the only true international "law" and that states have free reign over their own affairs. Similarly, a number of scholars now discern a legislative and judicial process to international law that parallels such processes within domestic law. Opponents to this point of view maintain that states only commit to international law with express consent and have the right to make their own interpretations of its meaning; and that international courts only function with the consent of states. Because international law is a new area of law its development is uncertain and its relevance and propriety is hotly disputed.
Sources of International Law
See main article:
Sources of International Law
International law has three primary sources: international treaties, custom, and general principles of law (cf. Art. 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice). International treaty law is comprised of obligations states expressly and voluntarily accept between themselves in
. Customary international law is derived from the consistent practice of States accompanied by opinio juris, i.e. the conviction of States that the consistent practice is required by a legal obligation. Judgments of international tribunals as well as scholarly works have traditionally been looked to as persuasive sources for custom in addition to direct evidence of state behavior. Attempts to codify customary international law picked up momentum after the
Second World War
with the formation of the
International Law Commission
(ILC). Codified customary law is made the binding interpretation of the underlying custom by agreement through treaty. For states not party to such treaties, the work of the ILC may still be accepted as custom applying to those states. General principles of law are those commonly recognized by the major legal systems of the world. Certain norms of international law achieve the binding force of
(jus cogens) as to include all states with no permissible derogations. Legal principles common to major legal systems may also be invoked to supplement international law when necessary.
Interpretation of International Law
Where there are disputes about the exact meaning and application of national laws, it is the responsibility of the courts to decide what the law means. In international law as a whole, there are no courts which have the authority to do this. It is generally the responsibility of states to interpret the law for themselves. Unsurprisingly, this means that there is rarely agreement in cases of dispute. The
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
writes on the topic of interpretation that:
"A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose." (article 31(1))
This is actually a compromise between three different theories of interpretation:
The textual approach is a restrictive interpretation which bases itself on the "ordinary meaning" of the text, the actual text has considerable weight.
A subjective approach considers the idea behind the treaty, treaties "in their context", what the writers intended when they wrote the text.
A third approach bases itself on interpretation "in the light of its object and purpose", i.e. the interpretation that best suits the goal of the treaty, also called "effective interpretation".
These are general rules of interpretation; specific rules might exist in specific areas of international law.
Enforcement by states
Apart from a state's natural inclination to uphold certain norms, the force of international law has always come from the pressure that states put upon one another to behave consistently and to honor their obligations. As with any system of law, many violations of international law obligations are overlooked. If addressed, it is almost always purely through
and the consequences upon an offending state's reputation. Though violations may be common in fact, states try to avoid the appearance of having disregarded international obligations. States may also unilaterally adopt sanctions against one another such as the severance of economic or diplomatic ties, or through reciprocal action. In some cases, domestic courts may render judgment against a foreign state (the realm of private international law) for an injury, though this is a complicated area of law where international law intersects with domestic law. States have the right to employ force in self-defense against an offending state that has used force to attack its territory or political independence. States may also use force in collective self-defense, where force is used against another state. The state that force is used against must authorize the participation of third-states in its self-defense. This right is recognized in the
United Nations Charter
Enforcement by international bodies
Violations of the UN Charter by members of the United Nations may be raised by the aggrieved state in the
for debate. The General Assembly cannot make binding resolutions, but under the "
Uniting for Peace
" resolution (GA/RES/0377) it declared it could authorize the use of force if there had been Breaches of the Peace or Acts of Aggression, provided that the Security Council due to a negative vote of a permement member failed to act. It could call for other collective measures (such as economic sanctions) given a situation constituted the milder "threat to the Peace". The legal significance of such a resolution is unclear, as the General Assembly cannot issue binding resolutions.
They can also be raised in the
. The Security Council can pass resolutions under Chapter VI of the UN Charter to recommend "Pacific Resolution of Disputes." Such resolutions are not binding under international law, though they usually are expressive of the council's convictions. In rare cases, the Security Council can pass resolutions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter related to "threats to Peace, Breaches of the Peace and Acts of Aggression," and these are legally binding under international law, and can be followed up with economic sanctions, military action, and similar uses of force through the auspices of the United Nations.
It has been argued that resolutions passed outside of Chapter VII can also be binding; the legal basis for that is the Council's broad powers under Article 24(2), which states that "in discharging these duties (exercise of primary responsibility in international peace and security), it shall act in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations". The mandatory nature of such resolutions was upheld by the
International Court of Justice
in its advisory opinion on
. The binding nature of such resolutions can be deduced from an interpretation of their language and intent.
States can also, upon mutual consent, submit disputes for arbitration by the
International Court of Justice
(ICJ), located in
. The judgments given by the Court in these cases are binding, although it possesses no means to enforce its rulings. The Court may give an advisory opinion on any legal question at the request of whatever body may be authorized by or in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations to make such a request. Some of the advisory cases brought before the court have been controversial with respect to the courts competence and jurisdiction.
Often enormously complicated matters, ICJ cases (of which there have been less than 150 since the court was created from the
Permanent Court of International Justice
in 1945) can stretch on for years and generally involve thousands of pages of pleadings, evidence, and the world's leading specialist public international lawyers. As of
, there are twelve cases pending at the ICJ. Decisions made through other means of arbitration may be binding or non-binding depending on the nature of the arbitration agreement, whereas decisions resulting from contentious cases argued before the ICJ are always binding on the involved states.
Though states (or increasingly,
) are usually the only ones with standing to address a violation of international law, some treaties, such as the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
have an optional
that allows individuals who have had their rights violated by member states to petition the international
Human Rights Committee
Through the ages a code developed for the relations and conduct between nations. Even when nations were at
were often considered immune to violence. The first formal attempts in this direction, which over time have developed into the current international law, stem from the era of the
. In the
it had been considered the obligation of the
to mediate in international disputes. During the
Council of Constance
, rector of
), theologian, lawyer and diplomat, presented the theory that all, including
, nations have right to self-govern and to live in peace and possess their land. In the
centuries the Church gradually lost its direct influence in international affairs, as
powers emerged and struggled for dominance and survival. At the beginning of the 17th century, several generalizations could be made about the political situation:
Self-governing, autonomous states existed.
Almost all of them were governed by monarchs.
The Peace of Westphalia is often cited as being the birth of the modern
, establishing states as sovereigns answering to no-one within its own borders.
Land, wealth, and trading rights were often the topics of wars between states.
Some people assert that international law developed to deal with the new states arising, others claim that the lack of influence of the
gave rise to the need for new generally-accepted codes in Europe. The
Francisco de Vitoria
Franciscus de Victoria) at the University of
lectured on the rights of the natives. He did so while
was at the height of its power, after the violent Spanish conquest of
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
, protested against the
, but in
new laws put the natives under protection of the Spanish
. Vitoria is generally recognized as the founder of modern international law. (See also School of Salamanca.) The
) came up with the idea of having representatives of all countries meeting in one place to discuss their conflicts so as to avoid war and create more peace. He suggested this in his The New Cyneas (
to be the selected city for all of the representatives to meet, and suggested that the Pope should preside over the meeting. Of course, during the
Thirty Years' War
), this was not acceptable to the Protestant nations. He also said that armies should be abolished and called for a world court. Though his call to abolish
was not taken seriously, Emeric Cruce does deserve his place in history through his foresight that international organizations are crucial to solve international disputes.
(or Huig de Groot) (
) was a Dutch
and jurist considered central to the development of international law. He became a lawyer when he was 15 years old and got sentenced to life in prison after going against
Maurice of Nassau
, son of
William of Orange
in a trial, but he escaped and fled to Paris. In France, he developed his ideas on international law with his Mare Liberum (
for "Free seas"), in which he challenged the claims and attempts of
to rule portions of the oceans and seas. He gained new international fame in
with his book De Jure Belli ac Pacis (The Law of War and Peace), as it became the first definitive text on international law in Europe. It was published only two years after The New Cyneas. Much of Grotius's content drew from the
and from classical history (
Augustine of Hippo
). In his work he did not condemn war as only a political tool, considering cases in which war is appropriate. He further developed the just war theory. A just war fits certain criteria:
It can be to repel an invasion.
It can be to punish an insult to God.
There has to be a just cause (one of the two mentioned above).
It has to be declared by the proper authorities.
It must possess moral intention.
It must have a chance of success.
It must abstain from brutal practices.
Its end result must be proportional to the means used.
The statesmen of the time believed no nation could escape war, so they prepared for it.
King Henry IV's
Chief Minister, the
Duke of Sully
, proposed the founding of an alliance of the European nations that was to meet to arbitrate issues and wage war not between themselves but collectively on the Ottoman Turks, and he called it the Grand Design, but was never established. After
World War I
, the nations of the world decided to form an international body.
came up with the idea of a "
League of Nations
". However, due to political wrangling in the
did not join the
League of Nations
, which was one of the causes of its demise. When
World War II
broke out, the
League of Nations
was finished. Yet at the same time, the
was being formed. On
Franklin D. Roosevelt
issued the "
Declaration by United Nations
" on behalf of 26 nations who had pledged to fight against the
. Even before the end of the war, representatives of 50 nations met in
to draw up the charter for an international body to replace the
League of Nations
, 1945, the
officially came into existence, setting a basis for much international law to follow.
res ipsa loquitur
, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (Latin for "the thing itself speaks") states that the elements of
duty of care
can be sometimes inferred from the very nature of an accident or other outcome, even without direct evidence of how any
behaved. Although modern formulations differ by jurisdiction, the
originally stated that the accident must satisfy the following conditions:
A "duty" exists for a person to act "reasonably"; and
A "breach" of this duty occurs because a person [or agency, etc.] acted outside this duty, or "unreasonably"; and
There was "causation in fact"...the result would not have occurred "but for" the "breach" of this duty;
There was actual legally recognizable harm suffered by the plaintiff who did nothing wrong (i.e., no
Upon a proof of res ipsa loquitur, the plaintiff need only establish the remaining two elements of
—namely, that the
suffered harm, of which the incident result was the legal cause.
Damnum abesque injuria
, damnum absque injuria (
for "loss without injury") is a phrase expressing the principle of
law in which some person (
) causes damage or loss to another, but does not injure them, and thus the latter has no
. For example, opening a burger stand near someone else's may cause them to lose customers, but this in itself does not give rise to a
cause of action
for the original burger stand owner.